SCOTUS

See the following -

Citizens United

Editorial | New York Times | June 25, 2012

The Supreme Court examined the Arizona immigration law in minute detail, but when it came to revisiting the damage caused by its own handiwork in the 2010 Citizens United case, it couldn’t be bothered. In a single dismissive paragraph on Monday, the court’s conservative majority refused to allow Montana or any other state to impose limits on corporate election spending and wouldn’t even entertain arguments on the subject. Read More »

Editorial: Campaign-finance Future Haunted by Montana's Past

Editorial | USA Today | June 26, 2012

Money spent anonymously to influence elections is almost by definition corrupting. If the public cannot make the connection between lawmakers' actions and the monied interests backing them, the temptation for almost extortion-like pressure is sure to follow.That prospect is very troubling. The future, it seems, might not be so far removed from Montana's past. Read More »

Is Today the Day When Obama Starts Explaining ACA’s Benefits to Americans?

Tom Sullivan | Government Health IT | June 28, 2012

Whether you agree with Obamacare or not, it’s quite clear that the current administration has done a rather lousy job spreading the word about its advantages – even tangible benefits that Americans already enjoy. Read More »

Latest SCOTUS ruling should accelerate eHealth spending

Larry Dignan | ZD Net | June 28, 2012

Summary: The Supreme Court just gave one sixth of the U.S. economy a lot of clarity. More health IT spending could follow, according to this recent article by Larry Dignan published in ZD Net.

The Supreme Court upheld the requirement in President Obama’s Affordable Care Act that individuals buy health insurance and may have accelerated the industry’s massive investment in information technology. Read More »

ObamaCare as Corporatists United: A Huge Bailout for Another Failing Industry

Clark Newhall | PNHP | June 29, 2012

The ideology that drives the Supreme Court, the political administration and the Congress is not Conservative or Liberal but can best be described as Corporatist. This is the ideology that affirms that “corporations are citizens, my friends.”  It is the ideology that drove the Roberts court to the odious Citizens United decision. It is the ideology behind a bailout for banks that are "too big to fail." And it is the ideology that allows Congress to pass a law like the ACA that is essentially written by a favored industry.

Read More »

Q&A: SCOTUS Ruling Could Spark ACO Uptake

Tom Sullivan | Government Health IT | June 29, 2012

While not often in the mainstream media coverage, among the Affordable Care Act provisions that promise to bring substantive improvements in care quality is the accountable care organization. Read More »

SCOTUS majority embraces individual mandate, ACA

Mary Mosquera | Government Health IT | June 28, 2012

The Supreme Court has ruled that it is constitutional to require that all Americans obtain health insurance coverage or pay a penalty, defying the expectations of many that the majority conservative leaning justices would strike it down.

Read More »

The SCOTUS Healthcare Reform Decision

John D. Halamka | Life as a Healthcare CIO | June 28, 2012

The SCOTUS decision to uphold the healthcare reform law ensures that these foundational components will still have urgency, since every provider organization will be motivated to implement them in order thrive in the healthcare marketplace of the future. Read More »

The Supreme Court’s Cowardice

Editorial | Bloomberg | June 26, 2012

In summarily dismissing a Montana case in which the state’s high court had upheld an anti- corruption statute regulating corporate spending on elections, the U.S. Supreme Court this week opted to see no evil, hear no evil and speak no truth. Read More »

Translating the Insurance Industry's Feel-good Rhetoric

Wendell Potter | iWatch News | July 2, 2012

Health insurers avoided their worst case scenario last week — the prospect of the Supreme Court striking down the individual mandate but letting the rest of the health care law, especially profit-threatening consumer protections, go forward. Now the industry can focus on a goal it has had all along: getting rid of those pesky consumer protections. Read More »

Who's Footing the Bills?

Staff Writer | Baker City Herald | June 22, 2012

In the 2fi years since Citizens United, it’s become clear that creative accounting can in some cases obscure from voters’ eyes the dollars behind the messages that bombard us with each election cycle. (And you can imagine the barrage which awaits us as Nov. 6 nears.)

Read More »

‘Health law upheld, but health needs still unmet’: national doctors group

Press Release | Physicians for a National Health Program | June 28, 2012

Although the Supreme Court has upheld the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the unfortunate reality is that the law, despite its modest benefits, is not a remedy to our health care crisis: (1) it will not achieve universal coverage, as it leaves at least 26 million uninsured, (2) it will not make health care affordable to Americans with insurance, because of high co-pays and gaps in coverage that leave patients vulnerable to financial ruin in the event of serious illness, and (3) it will not control costs.

Read More »