U.S. Missile Defense Strategy Is Flawed, Expert Panel Finds
After two years of study, a panel of top scientists and military experts working for the National Research Council has concluded that the nation’s protections against missile attacks suffer from major shortcomings, leaving the United States vulnerable to some kinds of long-range strikes.
In a report, the panel suggested that President Obama shift course by expanding a system he inherited from President George W. Bush and by setting aside the final part of an antimissile strategy he unveiled in 2009. In so doing, the panel said, the president could set up the nation’s defenses to better defeat the kinds of long-range missiles that Iran may be developing.
It is the first time that the research council, an arm of the National Academy of Sciences, has weighed in on the nation’s overall plans for defeating missile attacks.
- Tags:
- Arms Control Association (ACA)
- Barack Obama
- George W. Bush
- Iran
- L. David Montague
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
- missile attacks
- Missile Defense Agency (MDA)
- National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
- national defense
- National Research Council (NRC)
- Pentagon
- Philip E. Coyle
- Richard Lehner
- Ronald Reagan
- security
- Theodore A. Postol
- Tom Z. Collina
- Login to post comments