The Promise Of A New Internet
People tend to talk about the Internet the way they talk about democracy—optimistically, and in terms that describe how it ought to be rather than how it actually is. This idealism is what buoys much of the network neutrality debate, and yet many of what are considered to be the core issues at stake—like payment for tiered access, for instance—have already been decided. For years, Internet advocates have been asking what regulatory measures might help save the open, innovation-friendly Internet.
But increasingly, another question comes up: What if there were a technical solution instead of a regulatory one? What if the core architecture of how people connect could make an end run on the centralization of services that has come to define the modern net?
It's a question that reflects some of the Internet's deepest cultural values, and the idea that this network—this place where you are right now—should distribute power to people. In the post-NSA, post-Internet-access-oligopoly world, more and more people are thinking this way, and many of them are actually doing something about it...
- Tags:
- Athens Wireless Metropolitan Network
- Bitcoin
- Commotion
- DetroitCONNECTED
- Firechat
- future of the internet
- Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
- Institute For The Future (IFTF)
- internet
- Internet Service Providers (ISPs)
- KC Freedom Network
- mesh networks
- Michael Liebhold
- network neutrality
- Open Garden
- Stanislav Shalunov
- The Free Network Foundation
- Login to post comments