What Would It Take to Mainstream "Alternative" Agriculture?
Innovative food systems such as agroecology can become the norm if we weave a web of legitimacy from science, politics, society and values.
The industrialized food system, studies have shown, is linked to greenhouse gas emissions, algal blooms, pesticide pollution, soil erosion and biodiversity loss, to name a few ecological troubles. Add to this a long list of social ills, from escalating rates of obesity to the demise of the family farmer and deadening of rural landscapes and rural economies across much of the U.S.
In 2010, the National Academies of Science updated its seminal 1989 publication “Alternative Agriculture” with a fresh look at the state of food and farming in America. Its expert panel concluded, “Growing awareness of unintended impacts associated with some agricultural production practices has led to heightened societal expectations for improved environmental, community, labor, and animal welfare standards in agriculture.” Yet that growing awareness and those heightened expectations haven’t led to alternative agricultural systems becoming the norm in the U.S. Organic has made some headway, but many organic growers have been forced to imitate industrial farming: grow bigger, resort to monocultures instead of truly diversified fields, and sell to large supermarkets — forgoing many of the benefits alternative agricultural systems offer, such as natural pest control, pollination from native bees, and a smaller production scale conducive to family farmers and local food economies.
So, what gives industrialized agriculture such staying power despite its adverse impacts, even as alternatives offer such benefits? And how can more wholesome food production methods such as agroecology become conventional instead of alternative? To achieve real change in how food is produced and eaten, we need to change people’s expectations of what “normal” agriculture should look like. The industrial food system is considered “normal” and remains intractable for many reasons, including consumer habits (e.g., demanding perfectly shaped, vine-ripe tomatoes year-round), political and economic interests (e.g., agribusinesses wielding influence through election donations and lobbying), and priorities of government departments and universities (e.g., research programs favoring biotechnology over agroecology and classical plant breeding)...
- Tags:
- agroecology
- algal blooms
- alternative agricultural systems
- biodiversity
- biodiversity loss
- Biotechnology Innovation Organization
- Blue Revolutions
- Bolivia
- Brazil’s Zero Hunger policy
- collaboration
- David Brandt
- Elementa’s New Pathways to Sustainability in Agroecological Systems forum
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- food security
- green revolution
- greenhouse gas emissions
- industrialized food system
- Innovation
- La Via Campesina
- Latin American Scientific Society of Agroecology
- Mala ‘ Ai ‘ Opio Organic Farm
- Maywa Montenegro
- McKinsey Global Institute
- monocultures
- National Academies of Science
- National Science Foundation
- natural pest control
- Olivier De Schutter
- organic
- permaculture
- pesticide pollution
- resilience
- soil erosion
- Stability
- sustainability
- Taylor Branch
- The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity
- thick legitimacy
- Trans-Pacific Partnership
- True Costs of American Food
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
- United Nations General Assembly
- Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth (“Pachamama”)
- University of California
- Login to post comments